Saturday, 30 June 2012

30th JUNE 2012

Let's just take a momentary step back from being caring and intellectual people to discuss a matter of celebrity.

And by that, I mean let's add to the gossip.

It was announced today that Katie Holmes and Tome Cruise are splitting, with 33 year old Katie filing for a divorce on Thursday.



However, the big scandal was that a custody battle for the pair's six year old daughter Suri (never understood the name, never liked her really either. Thought she was bratty) would begin.

And I have to admit that although I don't particularly care for either Holmes or Cruise as actors, not particularly a fan of their work, this supposed custody battle grabbed my attention.

It is one of those interesting questions that you can ask of a celebrity power couple like Cruise and Holmes. I mean, either one of them could be the sole caregiver, both of them have legitimate claim to be THE parent.

But then that made me think; would Tom become Suri's sole caregiver because of the power that he holds? Does he have some sort of power that could sway the decision? Or would he win just by being her dad? Where is the line drawn between father power and celebrity power?

And I guess that is why this interested me. Figuring out whether or not this whole battle would be legitimate or not. Or is it all just publicity?

Whilst Cruise's career is still going strong, I don't hear of many good movies where the star is Katie Holmes.

And then, why is it that this is so interesting to all of us mere mortals? Are we really that shallow? Do our lives really revolve around these supposed 'stars' to that much of an overbearing extent?

I don't know. I hope not.

Quick, think of something smart!!! Save yourselves from the celebrity apocalypse!





Image available: http://www.jilaa.com/1187-tom+cruise+iyo+xaaskiisa+katie+holmes+way+isfureen+.html 

Thursday, 28 June 2012

29th JUNE 2009

On this day in 2009, in the U.S.A, Bernard Madoff, was sentenced to 150 years behind bars for his crimes of investment fraud in one of the largest Ponzi schemes in history.



Although stealing more than 65 billion dollars from investors, Madoff's defence asked for only 12 years in prison. Funny. Do you really think, defence person, that the man responsible for one of the largest investment fraud crimes in history was going to get away with it?!? I mean, 12 years is next to nothing for stealing that large a sum of money. I think that the judge and jury were totally, 100% correct in their sentencing of Madoff.

No wonder the courtroom audience applauded!

The 74 year old's charges included securities fraud, investment advisor fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, false statements, perjury, making false filings with the SEC, and theft from an employee benefit plan, just to name a few.

Another thing I found funny about this event was that the judge had been so specific with his sentencing of the total eleven charges against Madoff to the maximum time period. I love that it was 150 years and not life.

It's almost as though the judge is saying, if, by some chance you make it to one hundred years of age as you rot in prison, you'll still have all those extra years to think about all that money that you stole. Ha ha.

Just gotta love those vindictive judges, hey?

Image available: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877337,00.html 











Wednesday, 27 June 2012

28th JUNE 1997

Now I'm not a huge fan of sports. I like playing volleyball, hockey and watching basketball and baseball. Those are my four favourite sports, I think. There are probably others out there that I just can't think of right now. Swimming! It's a good summer sport.

Anyway, the point is that on this day in 1997, at the Las Vegas MGM Grand Garden Arena, Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield, both highly celebrated boxers, had a controversial match that resulted in the disqualification of Tyson.



The match did not reach the final rounds due to Tyson biting Holyfield on the ear and the match being temporarily stopped. Referee Mills Lane deducted two points from Tyson and the match resumed.

The match resumed and Tyson bit Holyfield again on the ear, this time ripping a chunk off, which was found on the ring floor after the fight. The match was stopped at the end of the third round and Tyson was disqualified, meaning that Holyfield was the winner.

Tyson claimed that his actions were in retaliation for Holyfield repeatedly head butting him without penalty.

Okay, sure. Because when somebody does something you immediately retaliate by becoming a cannibal and EATING THE OTHER PERSON!

Well, I know that Tyson didn't actually eat Holyfield's ear but still! Why would you bite so hard to rip off somebody's ear?!?

Would have been a great match to watch though!


Image available: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/media/65973/Evander-Holyfield-grimaces-with-pain-after-being-bitten-on-the 


Tuesday, 26 June 2012

27th JUNE 1975/1984/1987/1989

Okay, so as I was looking for things that happened on this day that were interesting to me, I couldn't really find any news events that really stood out.

I therefore decided to resort to my good old back up in the form of birthdays.

And I actually found some pretty good ones. Well, four ones actually, surprisingly all actors. Which says something about the kind of circles that encompass my life.

First up, a big old happy birthday goes out to Tobey Maguire, who in 1975 took his place on this planet. Famous for his role as Spiderman, my question is this: should Tobey be upset that he is no longer going to be Spiderman? That his role is going to Andrew Garfield? Talking to my brother about this is a hilarious conversation.
"Andrew Garfield can't be Spiderman. Spiderman is pale, not tan. Not tan I tell you!"



Second up, a happy birthday shout goes out to Khloe Kardashian, American socialite/reality TV star, born in 1984. I'm not a fan really of the Kardashian shows and stuff. I'm not really a fan of people who become famous for not doing anything. I feel that everyone should work and put effort into a career and making money. I don't like people who are just given life on a silver platter.



So, moving on!

Thirdly, I'm only really saying happy birthday to this guy because I could recognise who he was. In 1987, Ed Westwick, who is Chuck Bass from Gossip Girl, was born. Again, not a huge fan of GG. I watched the whole first season and about half of the second season and then all of a sudden there was two or three more seasons and I just couldn't keep up. So bye-bye GG and Ed.



Lastly, (and I left my favourite to last) HAPPY BIRTHDAY NEVILLE!! Well, the actor who plays Neville. On this day, in 1989, Matthew Lewis was born and I'm sure that he knew deep, deep in his newborn mind, that he was going to be a fabulous actor and become the greatest that is Neville Longbottom.



So, happy birthday to everybody and anybody else born on this day!

And that is that.



Image 4 available: http://matthewlewislove.tumblr.com/page/2 
Image 3 available: http://freeimagesarchive.com/img14931.search.htm
Image 2 available: http://au.askmen.com/galleries/khloe-kardashian/picture-1.html#!4 
Image 1 available: http://www.bornrich.com/toby-maguire.html 











Monday, 25 June 2012

26th JUNE 2009

A sad piece today.

On this day in 2009, American actress Farrah Fawcett died at the age of sixty-two from cancer, with her partner Ryan O'Neal by her side.



Farrah had been struggling with cancer for a long time before her death, which came only weeks after a documentary about her struggle aired on television.

Perhaps Farrah's most famous role was that of Jill Munroe in Charlie's Angels, as well as a long and varied television, movie and stage career.

Just, sad.


But here is one of my favourite videos of Farrah as Munroe. Just one of the classics really.


Image available: http://blog.trialandheirs.com/tag/farrah-fawcett 
Video available: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJTBs24szWo 

25th JUNE 2011

On this day in 2011, New York became the sixth state in the U.S.A to legalise same-sex marriage.

With a 33-29 vote in favour of a bill that allowed couples of the same sex to be legally married, Governor Cuomo signed the bill into law. The bill had already been approved in the state's lower house. Same-sex weddings were expected to start within thirty days of the bill being approved.

And I'm assuming that they did.

I agree with the issue on same-sex marriage in that it should be legalised within Australia, and other countries if the people of that country so desire.

I'm not gay. I don't have a billion gay friends who all scream to me the unfairness that is their illegality to get married. I don't intentionally hate those of religion who appear to be the main fighting force against marriage equality. I'm not trying to be cool and join those on the 'cool people' side.

I just think that love should trump everything else.

And really, that's all it should boil down too.

Just love.






Image available; http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/01/03/individualist-vs-social-frames-favoring-gay-marriage/ 

24th JUNE 1901

On this day in 1901, in the fabulous city of Paris, France, the first major exhibition of Pablo Picasso's artwork opened at a gallery on the Paris' rue Lafitte, a street famous for its prestigious art galleries.

Picasso, born in 1881, was a Spanish painter, sculptor, printmaker, ceramicist and stage designer and is regarded as one of the greatest and most influential artists of the 20th century.

Artistically speaking, a lot of the techniques that are used today were either created solely or in partnership with Picasso, such as collage.

Among his most famous works are Les Demoiselles d'Avignon (1907) and Guernica (1937), which depicts the German bombing of Guernica during the Spanish Civil War.

I wouldn't say that I'm huge fan of Picasso, but he is one of the more well known artists that I know of. And his work is inspiring and interesting to look at.





Image 1 available: http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/pica/hd_pica.htm
Image 2 available: http://picassogallery.blogspot.com.au/2011_01_18_archive.html
Image 3 available: http://middle-aged-diva.blogspot.com.au/2011/06/art-of-pablo-picasso.html

23rd JUNE 2000

When I learnt that a very strong news value that drew people to stories, news events, basically any piece of information, was tragedy, I can immediately remember thinking, well that may be true but not to the extent that you're suggesting, surely?

I would now like to let my past self know: you were wrong.

I am finding myself more and more being drawn towards news stories that are depressing, saddening, about murder or death. And that is making me seriously question my own happiness and mental condition. I mean, come on self, what's the deal?! Stop reading use depressing stories!

It is a very strong news value though, so I don't really think that I'll stop reading these stories any time soon. But I will definitely try to read more happy stories. Stories with fluffy bunnies and rainbows.

But I digress. Quite extensively, do I digress and for that I apologise.

On this day in 2000, a fire at the Childers' Palace Backpackers Hostel in Childers, Queensland, resulted in the death of 15 backpackers and the complete destruction of the building.



Robert Paul Long was charged and found guilty of murder and arson, intentionally lightning the blaze that would claim the lives of nine women and six men.

He is now serving a life sentence in prison, for his horrendous crimes.

A large factor in the death of the 15 people was that the building, mainly constructed from heavy timber beams, did not have working fire alarms and smoke detectors. Also, majority of the victims were on the second floor of the building.

It's sad to think that there are people who go out of their way to hurt others. I know that I'm starting to sound like a broken record here, but I just can't understand what positions someone to do a thing like that.

I know that I just went on and on about how I like to read depressing stories and the news events that are about things that are sad, but I would never, ever, EVER intentionally hurt someone.

So, I guess that's one little good thing about me




Image available: http://www.news.com.au/national/a-tragic-toll-building-fires-in-australia/story-e6frfkvr-1226198730228 


Friday, 22 June 2012

22nd JUNE 2004

AS much as you hope and pray, there are still crazy people out there in the world. The ones who do harm, the ones that hurt people and cause you to not be able to sleep at night.

On this day in 2004, in Belgium, convicted pedophile and child killer Marc Dutroux is sentenced to life in prison for the kidnap and rape of six young girls, as well as the murder of four young girls.



Dutroux and his accomplices, abducted the girls and kept them in a purpose-built dungeon in Dutroux's basement.

I'm not really concerned with the facts of the event. More with what something like this, somebody like Dutroux represents.

It's that series of words right there can freak me out so much and really make me question why these people do things like this.

"Purpose-built".

A lawyer might try and raise the issue of their client's sanity. But not here. The fact that Dutroux intentionally abducted and raped and killed these girls. I just can't understand that.

Why? For me, it is the ultimate question in nearly every situation. Why?

What drives a person to abduct and kill children? Innocent children.

Just, what goes on in a person's head that possess them to do something like that?

And I know that in most cases there is  something wrong with these people. They might have suffered abuse when they were a child. They might have some mental disorder. But really, can't we just call them what they are?

Crazy. Scary. Creepy. Confused. People that you would want to stay away from. Sick.

People that you wouldn't want to know. Or would want to become.

Ever.




Image available: http://ramirezdahmerbundy.tumblr.com/post/9381694820/marc-dutroux-who-stands-accused-of-child-killings 

21st JUNE 2003

This book series is one of my absolute favourites. It linked me together with a group of other people who, through this series, could keep on believing in things that we thought we had grown out of when we were children.

I am of course, talking about Harry Potter.

On this day in 2003, British fantasy author J.K Rowling's fifth HArry Potter book, "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" was released, becoming the fastest selling book ever.



Three years since the release of the previous Harry Potter novel, The Order of the Phoenix follows, for those of you who are clearly living in a box with monks, the fifth year of schooling at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry for Harry, Hermione and Ron, and the rest of the Potter book characters we know and love.

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix has now sold over 55 million copies worldwide. It was made into the fifth Potter movie in 2007.

The first Potter book, "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone", release in 1997, is still the most popular of the series, with over 120 million copies sold.

My favourite was always the fourth one and then the third. Surprisingly, I was never actually that big of a fan of the fifth one. But I will always love this series!

It was one of the first 'novel' books that I ever read. I love the movies. I love the characters and the actors.

And I will keep hoping and dreaming that one day, my letter from Hogwarts will find its way to me. Despite the fact that I am no longer eleven.

I'll make it to Hogwarts one day!








Image available: http://books-for-everyone.com/novels-c-76/harry-potter-and-the-order-of-the-phoenix-book-5-by-j-k-rowlin-m-758

Tuesday, 19 June 2012

20th JUNE 1975

Da-dum...da-dum...da-dum da-dum da-dum da-dum DADILDUM!!!

Okay, although my ability to write random sounds as words is not so good hopefully you all got the idea of what today's post is about.

On this day in 1975, Steven Spielburg's summer blockbuster film "JAWS" was released in more than 450 screens across America.



For those of you who have not seen this iconic film, JAWS is focused on events unfolding in the small (and fictional) resort town of Amity Island, where holiday goers are being attacked and killed by an enormous great white shark. An oceanographer, shark hunter and the town's police chief constitute the main characters who must catch and kill the shark.

It cost $9 million dollars to make, which was well over the original budget. Even with the extended budget, malfunctions and accidents continued to occur, specifically to that of the mechanical shark. In the end it was decided by Spielburg that the shark's presence would be suggested rather than actual through the use of the ominous theme music, created by composer John Williams.

Totally over $470 650 000 at the box office, that annoying da-dum seemed to have the impact that Spielburg wanted.

I first saw JAWS at school in, I think, grade nine or eight. I didn't want to go swimming for a good couple of weeks afterwards. And I think only those people who are kidding themselves would say otherwise.


Stay out of the water...



Image available: http://www.totalwallpapers.com/wallpapers.asp?number_id=145 
Video available: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucMLFO6TsFM 

19th JUNE 1968

Of all the public advocates throughout history (and there have been a lot, both great and well known, and small and not so well known) I think Martin Luther King Jr. is perhaps my favourite.

On this day in 1968, in Washington D.C., America, 50 000 people participated in "The Poor People's March" to address issues of economic justice. The event, organised by Martin Luther King Jr. and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, demanded economic aid be given to the poorest communities in the U.S.A. and was targeted to not just black people but to those with poor people of every minority.



However, on April 4, King was assassinated. That did not stop the march from going ahead. If anything, it encouraged those who were followers of King and his dream, to pick up where he had left off. The key figures in the organising the event included King's widow and a group of ministers, including the Revs. Ralph Abernathy and Jesse Jackson.

Although about 50 000 people ended up marching, many people (mainly those who had grown weary of protesting) considered the event a failure as immediate change was not seen straight away.

For many of America's poor, there hasn't been much progress in the past 40 years since the day's of the Poor People's March, when 25 million people (nearly 13 percent of the population) were living below the poverty level, as in 2006, 36 million people (or more than 12 percent of the population) were living people the poverty level.

Almost after the march, protesters erected a settlement of tents and shacks on the National Mall, camping out there for six weeks. The city became known as Resurrection City.

Sure we think about those in poverty. We have a stereotypical image of those with no money, no food and generally nothing in our heads all the time. We see them as being beneath us in many ways, not seeing ourselves as better, but just seeing them as worse off.

But do we ever really do anything to help them? My family has been sponsoring a child through World Vision since 2004. Every year we get a photo and a every three months or so we get a card, almost like a report from her. And I started sending letters back to her every year two years ago and she sends me replies. I love hearing from her. I love that my family is helping her and her family to grow and get better. I'm not Angelina Jolie. I'm not doing it because everyone else is doing it. Sure it makes me feel good to be helping somebody, but really I'm doing it for them. I do not in anyway think that I am better than Amy and her family. I am just doing my bit to help her. I'm giving her a 'friendly hand to hold' (woah, look at me getting all metaphorical on your asses!)

If you want to look into sponsoring a child or several children, head to the World Vision website to find out more.







Image available: http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/king/b1.html 

Monday, 18 June 2012

18th JUNE 1983

On this day in 1983, in America, the space shuttle 'Challenger' was launched in to space on its second mission. Aboard the shuttle was Dr. Sally Ride, who as a mission specialist became the first American woman to travel into space.


Sally Ride, who was at the time also the youngest American to go into space, joined NASA in 1978, answering an ad in the paper in which NASA was asking for participants for the space program. Before joining NASA ride attended Stanford University, graduating with a bachelor's degree in English and Physics, as well as earning her master's degree and Ph.D. in physics, doing research in astrophysics and free electron laser physics.

Ride remained a member of NASA up until 1987 when she left to work at the Standford University Centre for International Security and Arms Control. In 1989 she became a professor of physics at the University of California, San Diego and Director of the California Space Institute. Ride has been inducted into the National Women's Hall of Fame and has two elementary schools named after her in America; Sally K. Ride Elementary School in The Woodlands, Texas and Sally K. Ride Elementary School in Germantown, Maryland.

See that, a woman made it into space! And, has two schools named after her! That's really cool. I would't say that I'm an extreme feminist in the kind of root fashion of the word. That is to say I don't think feminists need to burn their bras and not shave their legs ever, but I do think that women deserve to be treated as equals and seen as such, not only by males, but by each other.

I mean, it's all well and good to say that men need to treat women with respect, and I think that nowadays we are sort of in that stage, where we do have some really good levels of gender equality, but I still believe we have a long way to go before it ever fully be comes acceptable for a man and a woman to be seen as 'the same'.

A lot of this probably boils down to the ability of women to view each other as being equals in terms of rights too. I know that I am guilty of seeing other women, just by how they dress or how they act, as being in some sense inferior to me. I know that this probably makes me a horrible person. And I'm not just doing it to women. I judge males extensively as well. We all do.

So maybe that it what lies at the base of all our problems when it comes to equality: our ability and almost need to judge each other.

If that is the case, well, we're in a bit of a pickle now aren't we?


Image available: http://thewomensfoundation.org/2011/women’s-history-month-qa-day-march-11-2011/ 

Saturday, 16 June 2012

17th JUNE 2008

Some weird stuff happens in this big old world of ours.

On this day in 2008, a severed foot was found by police washed up on a beach in Vancouver, Canada.



The foot is the fifth to be found by police since August 2007 on the same stretch of beach. The first two feet washed up in August, the third in February 2008 and the fourth in May 2008. Of the five feet, majority had running shoes on.

In 2010, at least 10 feet had been found between Vancouver and Washington State in the U.S.A. What is possibly the most interesting thing however, is that it is still unknown as to where the feet came from or why they appeared on the beach. Several conspiracy theories have perpetuated including that the feet belonged to mafia victims, 2004 Asian tsunami victims or people missing from a 2005 plane crash.

I think my favourite is the mafia victims one. That just seems so police/crime television show or film worthy.

Can you imagine walking along that beach and then coming across a shoe with a cut off foot in it? A cut off foot?


Image available: http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/06/vancouver-foot-mystery-sixth-foot-found-latest-foot-a-hoax/ 

16th JUNE 1978

On this day in America, in 1978,  the movie Grease opened in cinemas for the first time.



The film, directed by Randal Kleiser and which is based on Warren Casey and Jim Jacob's 1971 musical of the same name, follows the love story of Olivia Newton-John and John Travolta as they make their way through the ups and downs of their final year of high school.

I love this movie. Not to the point where I watch it every year on the same day, but it is a good movie to watch. I 100% recommend it to anyone who has not seen it. And also offer you a slight sarcastic comment of "and why have you not watched it?!" Because it really is one of those classic movies, where you remember the lines to the songs because they're easy and catchy, you know what happens at the end but you still yell at the bad guys and cheer for the good guys.

I think that everyone should watch this movie. Even if you aren't a fan of musicals, just watch it for the hilariousness that is young John Travolta.

For example:







Video available: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXlnMveRt-Y 
Image available: http://www.filmmasterjournal.com/2011/07/grease-1978.html 

Thursday, 14 June 2012

15th JUNE 1945 - Final Look at JOUR1111

On this day in 1945, Judy Garland, 23 years of age, married husband number two, Vincente Minnelli, a director. The couple had one daughter, actress and signer Liza Minnelli.

There are two reasons why I chose this event for today.

One:


And two:



That is all.

Well, now that Introduction to Journalism and Communication is almost over, I can actually look back it and see it without all the stress and just look at it, I can see that I did get a lot out of it. And more to the point, that it was both fun and really informative.

My favourite aspect of the course was definitely this blog. I mean, in what other course would you be able to classify putting up videos of Judy Garland singing and have it actually count as work?!?! This course really opened up my eyes to what constitutes the journalism profession, how it isn't all just newspapers and magazines. As we head in to far superior technological times, areas of the journalism career like being a blogger both in the written and video sense are going to excel.

Ah! Just so excited for what the future holds!


14th JUNE 1961

Who knew that crossing the road could be such a drama?!

On this day in the UK in 1961, it was determined that good old black and white zebra crossings weren't good enough any more, and that a new type of road crossing with push button controls was to be introduced in the following year (1962).



Apparently, a worrying number of accidents were occurring surrounding zebra crossings due to drivers not paying attention, pedestrians assuming that the cars would stop and just walking out, such that in the last six months of 1960, 533 people were killed or injured on zebra crossings, compared to 447 for the last six months of 1959.

It was proposed that the new push button-controlled crossings would be introduced between approximately 40 and 50 sites across England and Wales.

However, the new "panda crossing" system was largely unsuccessful and was quickly disbanded.

The crossing consisted of triangular black and white strips, instead of the rectangular strips of the zebra crossings. On either side of the road was a push button which controlled a set of flashing lights. When a pedestrian pushed the button, a flashing light came on telling the pedestrian to wait. At this stage, a yellow or amber coloured light would come on to let drivers know that they have to slow down, before it turned to red which would let them know that they have to be stationary by this point. Next, a 'walk' sign would illuminate telling the pedestrian to 'walk', which after a specified time would start to flash warning the pedestrian that the traffic lights are about to change back to green and that it would be unsafe for them to cross.

Apparently, that was too confusing.

Following the "panda crossing" failure, the "pelican crossing" and "puffin crossing" systems were released, the latter of which is the most similar to our current traffic light systems.

It's just so weird to think that if the people had not liked the "panda crossing" system so much, it could still be the system that we have today.

This picture would have been so much different I'll tell you that much!



Image 1 available: http://www.cbrd.co.uk/histories/pedestriancrossings/4.shtml 
Image 2 available: http://www.thebeatles.com/#/albums/Abbey_Road

Tuesday, 12 June 2012

13th JUNE 2005

Okay, so today's event may or may not offend some people by my putting it up. I'm not really sure if it's a touchy subject to some people or not. But there were some interesting things that I noticed about it that I wanted to share with you, so I thought that I would talk about it and see what happened.

On this day in 2005, music megastar Michael Jackson was found not guilty on all charges, after being accused of molesting and serving alcohol to thirteen-year-old Gavin Arvizo. Jackson continued to deny the claims against him throughout the very public four-month-long trial in California.



See, now what I was worried about was that it was too close to his death to be bringing up bad memories like this, and that we should all remember the good things about Michael Jackson. To be honest, I had actually forgotten all about this until I read it.

What is actually even more interesting is that at the time, in 2005, I can remember thinking that Michael Jackson was creepy and that there was some song that we used to sing to make fun of him (which I can't remember now so that's probably a good thing) but I never actually knew what made MJ so creepy. I never actually knew this story. And now reading it is weird because it made me think how we, as human beings, really do take a lot of things for granted and we really do shape our thoughts and values a lot on what other people say.

It's so very ironic that this was the story that I chose to read about because at this point in time I am currently mass studying for a communication exam, and I know that a lot of who were are, our identities and our perceptions, are shaped and defined through others, whether it be through their influence or actually in how we see our selves differing to them.

Even though I now know what Michael Jackson was accused of, I'm not going to think any less of him. I'll still think of him in the same way but I'll just have that little extra bit of information in my head that will help me help others make sense of certain things.





Image available: http://www.topnews.in/light/people/michael-jackson?page=6 

Monday, 11 June 2012

12th JUNE 2011

I've never considered myself an extremely tall person. I know that I'm tall, because every year since preschool in the class photos I was always at the back, but I never considered myself to be that tall.

Now, although you might be thinking, "what does her being tall have to do with anything?" I know that you are incredibly smart people who are going to assume that today's event has something to do with height. Probably the heights of humans. Because you are smart like that.

On this day in 2011, Junrey Balawing, a resident of Sindangan in the Philippines, was given the title of world's shortest living man by Guinness World Record officials during his eighteenth birthday celebration (so happy 19th birthday for today Junrey).



Balawing stands at a total of 59.93 centimetres tall, or about 23.59 inches. It's fascinating to think that the body can just not grow like that. I know that your body does reach a point where it stops growing, but to think that it would happen, in the case of Balawing, before the age of two is just bizarre. Doctors couldn't explain why Balawing was short and I think that would bug me to no end!

What would bug me further would be finding out less than 8 months later that you are no longer the shortest living man.

Yes, in February of this year, Chandra Bahadur Dangi or Nepal, was declared the world's shortest living man, standing at 54.6cm (21.5 in).

6 centimetres difference. It can't be a good thing that people keep getting shorter, can it? And what cause people to have this sort of physical condition where they don't grow? The human body is a weird, weird thing. You can have incredibly tall people and incredibly short people and bunch of people in between.

Just weird. But good weird.





Image available: http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/857684-new-worlds-smallest-man-poised-to-claim-title 

Sunday, 10 June 2012

11th JUNE 2011

It just makes me so angry, and hurt, every time I read an article in the news or watch it on TV and see that there is still war going on in various countries. And as hard as I try to believe that one day we will all have the Miss U.S.A dream of 'world peace', I don't really believe that any more. War has become an inevitable factor in our lives.

On this day in 2011, thirty-four people were killed and another ninety wounded when a bomb went off in a market place in Peshawar, Pakistan.



Rebellion, war, terrorism. The names for what we call it are many but at its simplest it still rips a hole in the heart of millions. It still makes us feel horrible when we hear that this 'act' (of war, of terrorism, of violence) has resulted in death.

In regards to the 2011 Peshawar bomb, which had been placed in a garbage pile in the markets close to army and political offices, it was intended to hurt people. It was intended to make the people suffer. And I think maybe that is what is the most heart-wrenching.

You hear about war, terrorism, violence, more and more these days. Maybe it is because they are a popular news story, they have that big news value to draw your attention, but more likely it is because that is just what is going on out there in the world. Our lives are becoming more violent, more dangerous.

What I'm basically trying to say is this life is war.

Which sucks.




Image available: http://www.theage.com.au/world/dozens-dead-as-pakistan-war-hits-lahore-20090527-bnmu.html 

Saturday, 9 June 2012

10th JUNE 1935

Today marks the anniversary of the formation of an institution that helps people worldwide gradually regain their dignity, confidence and levelheadedness.

On this day in 1935, Bill Wilson, a member of The Oxford Group, a non-denominational movement that focused heavily on religion, specifically Christianity, as a way through which to remain sober, and Dr. Robert Smith, a surgeon and member of The OG who could not stop drinking or remain sober, sat down together in Akron, Ohio for Dr. Bob's last drink.

It is this day which is marked as the start of Alcoholics Anonymous, an international mutual aid movement.



What differed between The OG and AA was that whilst the former focused on remaining sober by believing in God and religion, the latter determined that members could get sober by believing in each other and in the strength of the group.

AA's primary purpose is for the individual to remain sober and at the same time help others to achieve sobriety, which is achievable through the groups Twelve Step program and understanding the group's Twelve Traditions (which include recommendations that members and groups remain anonymous in public media and that group members stay away from dogma, governing hierarchies and involvement in public issues)

Other groups, such as Narcotics Anonymous, have adopted and adapted the Twelve Steps and Traditions to their respective primary purposes.

Whilst in 2006 AA claimed to have over 1.8 million members and over 100 000 groups worldwide, more recent data shows that AA now has more than 2 million members.

Yet, is this necessarily a good thing?

I mean, sure it's great that people around the world recognise that they have a place they can go, people they can talk to if they do get to that stage of excessive and continual drinking. But what I want to know is how more than 2 million people let themselves get to that stage? How does it end up like this? More to the point, how do they let themselves get to that point?

I've never known anyone to be a member of AA. Although, I think that's not necessarily a bad thing, considering the group is called Alcoholics Anonymous not Alcoholics Let's-Tell-Everyone. So maybe my inability to quite comprehend what is going on with this group and these alcoholics stems in some ways from that.

I wanted to find out a bit more about AA. I googled it, visited the AA website which was interesting and there were a couple of videos on there about people who had joined AA and were now changed for the better. But I though that this was a little bit biased, so my next step was to go to YouTube and search for "alcoholics anonymous funny" because if you ever want to know somebody or something's flaws, look to comedians. These people intentionally pick out what is bad and use that to their advantage.

And in this quest of mine, I found this:


Not sure if it's funny. I actually think it's kind of crude and maybe goes a little bit too far. See, it's hard with groups like AA, to know where the boundaries are.

So, I leave it up to you. It's your decision.

Which is really actually quite a good motto in itself I think:


It's your decision.






Image available: http://www.brooklynintergroup.org/
Video available: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n86JKqA8o4w 

Friday, 8 June 2012

9th JUNE 2008

On this day in 2008, over one hundred whales were stranded off the north coast of Madagascar in the Baie de Loza.



The first of the melon-headed whales became stranded at the end of May after swimming through a narrow entrance into a bay, quickly becoming trapped.

On this day, despite the best efforts of locals and experts from around the world, close to thirty whales had already died.

At approximately the same time, the Exxon Mobil oil company were carrying out seismic surveying in a nearby area. Although they deny having an influence in the stranding of the whales, the Exxon company halted the program whilst the whales remained stranded.

Past incidences have indicated that echo-sounding equipment does have an influence on how whales communicate, such that the seismic surveying may have had some impact, however unintentional. The Exxon company further argued that they had used echo equipment before with no impact and that their echo-equipment could not have had any effect given that the surveying was being conducted more than 50 kilometres (or 31 miles) away.

And yet, scientists and researchers have conducted extensive experimentation and research into the distance to which a whale or dolphin can hear, conclusive of a hearing distance somewhere between 50 miles and indeed 1000 miles for various species of whale.

So while Exxon Mobil may not have intended to do any damage, the repercussions may still have been catastrophic in any instance.

Just because we are the dominant animal on this planet does not give us the right to abuse that power. Isn't that what animal rights activist have been saying for years?

I am not an extreme animal activist. I do believe that in some instances, not all animals should be respected in the way that animal activists are proposing. Snakes for example. I dislike snakes a lot. They are unpredictable and have you noticed that most snake cartoons are evil? There is a reason behind that. It's because they are evil.

But I respect that what animal activists are saying in the humane treatment of other animals. Treat others how you wanted to be treated, right?

So I think that the whale stranding case is a great example of the power and strength of humanity to be evil and dispassionate towards animals, and the things that can happen because we just don't think.

Thinking is important.

Yeah.

If you want to understand the seriousness of the impact of humanity on whales, the WWF and Save The Whales websites can give you that information and I thoroughly suggest a read.




Image available: http://explow.com/Melon-headed_whale 



Thursday, 7 June 2012

8th JUNE 2009

Sometimes journalists need to put themselves on the line to get the really good stories. At the same time, journalists need to ask themselves "is this story really with it? Is it as good as I'm making it out to be?" In the case of Lee and Ling, probably not.

On this day in 2009, a North Korean court announced that the two American journalists, Euna Lee and Laura Ling, who had attempted to cross the China/North Korea border in March, had been found guilty of illegal entry and were subsequently sentenced to twelve years hard labour.



The pair were working for U.S independent cable television network 'Current TV' co-founded by Al Gore, based in San Francisco, California. I'm not sure if the pair are still working there after this ordeal but at the time, Lee was the news editor of the channel and Ling was one of the agency's reporters.

Also, travelling with the pair was an American cameraman, Mitch Koss and a South Korean male guide. These two initially escaped capture by running away faster, and when caught were not charged or even detained, as there was no evidence implicating them of any crime, just the two women.

The exact story that the pair was working had numerous variations, including both a story about refugees and one on the trafficking of women.

At the time of their arrest, the two women were said to have been shooting video footage of the border region of China and North Korea, on the Korean side of the Tumen River. The two journalists claim they were only on Korean soil for about thirty seconds before crossing back to the Chinese side, nonetheless being caught by two Korean People's Army soldiers, Son Yong-ho and Kim Chol, who, during an interview on North Korean television, claimed that the two women had attempted to bribe him for their release after their capture, but that he had rejected their offer.

It was their sentencing and the knowledge that North Korean labour camps are particularly brutal, that initiated the involvement of the U.S government to 'free' the two reporters. Apparently all these high ranking government officials were involved, with former U.S president Bill Clinton making a publicly unannounced visit to North Korea on August 4.

A day later the two reporters were given a pardon by North Korean leader Kim Jong-il and were sent back to America.

Coincidence? I think not. But that really is beside the point, as I'm 100% sure that there is more to that story that I am just deciding not to look into.

What was most interesting for me was that Christian missionaries working amongst North Korean refugees in north east China say that the whole scenario was a scheme in which the guide was involved to capture a "foreign prize", what we would commonly refer to as a journalist. Yet the guide denies even suggesting the two reporters should go near the river, in fact, stating that he had warned them to avoid the area of the border.

The 'foreign prize scheme' idea is however strengthened when Ling made a statement against this remark, claiming that Chun, the guide, had not warned them and had not really said anything about going or not going to the river.

I guess there are two morals here in this story. Make sure you know the rules when travelling or travelling with work. And two, seriously think about whether or not the story is going to be worth it all.

Because as much as the refugee/trafficking of women story would have been good journalism, you shouldn't let the story rule you.




Image available: http://articles.nydailynews.com/2009-08-05/news/17934078_1_euna-lee-laura-ling-north-korea 

Wednesday, 6 June 2012

7th JUNE 2011

Scandal! Rumour! Gossip! There are many words for it but they all really connote the same thing. Somebody did something wrong and we all get to know about it. Isn't that the way these things normally work?

Most of the time, we don't have to even know the person or people involved and yet it still interests us. We're funny like that, us humans. We like to know what other people are doing, but don't want other people to know what we are doing.

This is of course all moot on its own. This speculation. However, an example can and will easily rectify this.

On this day in 2011, Anthony Weiner, a New York Congressman, admitted to sending inappropriate photos and communicating with women online.



This scandal only came into existence when Mr. Weiner accidentally posted a close-up picture of his clothed genitals on Twitter, for many, many people to see. The photo was intended as a private message for a woman.

Mr. Weiner, in a state of what one can only assume was shame, apologised and indicated his regret for his actions at a televised news conference.

Later in the month, Mr. Weiner resigned from his post as congressman.

I love the irony associated with the incident and with his name. It just seems to cap of the story, gives it a nice ending. What is also sort of humorous to note, is that we do not treat politicians as regular people. If anybody else had done this sort of thing, like a celebrity or even one of our mates, it would just have made for a really good story. Depending on whether or not we felt that the person involved usually does stuff like this or whether it was a first time occurrence would have effected how we perceived that person, sure. But I don't think that we would have been saying, "resign, resign resign!!!"

One of the many reasons I will never go into politics is that I couldn't handle the pressure to be that perfect image that everyone is expecting of me. I think that actors have it a little easier off than politicians, so I could be one of those.

But never a politician.

I'll leave that to Julia.




Image available: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/55992.html 

Tuesday, 5 June 2012

6th JUNE 1981

On this day in 1981 a railway disaster occurred when a train travelling between Mansi and Saharsa, India, commonly called the Bihar line, derailed whilst crossing a bridge, falling into the Bagmati river below.



It is estimated that between 500 and 800 passengers died. After five days over 200 bodies were recovered. The remainder of passengers were missing, feared to have washed away by the river.

What is perhaps most interesting is the cause of the derailment. No one cause is conclusive as the cause of the disaster. There are those sources (websites and such) who say that it was because of a cyclone. Others believe it was flash flooding. Another site believed that it was brake failure while trying to avoid hitting a water buffalo or a cow.

All of this is beside the point though, because regardless of whether or not the train derailed due to a cow or a cyclone, the Bihar train crash remains one of the worst railway disasters in India and quite possibly the world.



Image available:http://43blogtips.com/2011/08/worst-train-accidents-in-india/ 

Monday, 4 June 2012

5th JUNE 2008

On this day in 2008, over one hundred people gathered in Paris for the funeral of French fashion designer  Yves Saint Laurent, four days after his death form a brain tumour at the age of 71.

Whilst his father had died in 1988, Saint Laurent's death came before that of his 95 year old mother and his sisters.



Famous for creating one of the first ready-to-wear lines, Saint Laurent popularised fashion trends such as safari jackets for men and women, tight pants, thigh-high boots and indeed the most famous of all his creations, the tuxedo suit for women in 1966, often referred to as Le Smoking.

A year after his death, in February of 2009, an auction selling some 733 art items of Saint Laurent's was held at the Grand Palais, with the proceeds going towards the creation of a new foundation for AIDS research. Some of the artwork included paintings from Picasso, ancient Egyptian sculptures and a Henri Matisse painting Les coucous, tapes bleu et rose that sold for a record breaking 32 million euros on the first day.


There was slight controversy involved with the auction, with the Chinese government attempting to stop the sale of two 18th-century bronze Chinese zodiac sculptures ( a rabbit head and rat head) which had been stolen from the Old Summer Palace by the French and British Forces during the invasion of China in 1860. Whilst a French judge dismissed the claim and the sculptures sold for just over $20 000 000, it later became known that the bid had been placed by a representative of China's National Treasures Fund, which was seeking to bring the items back to China.

A second auction was held in November to sell some 1185 items including Saint Laurent's last Mercedes-Benz and his Hermes luggage.

I'm not a huge fashion fan, but I do appreciate the notion of incorporating feminist ideals into fashion. And Yves Saint Laurent certainly did that with his tuxedo suit for women.

May your memory and clothing line live on Saint Laurent.




Image 1 available: http://dualshow.com/yves-saint-laurent/ 
Image 2 available: http://www.fashiontrendlatest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Yves-Saint-Laurent.jpg 

Sunday, 3 June 2012

4th JUNE 1989

Beginning in April and continuing on various dates throughout May, riots and protests were held in Tiananmen Square in the very heart of Beijing by Chinese students and just general members of the Chinese public who felt that it was time for greater democratic rights to be allowed to the people of China and for the corruption of the Chinese government to end.



Nearly everyday some riot or protest occurred in May and I could have written about any one of them. I mean the movement lasted seven weeks.

However, on this day in 1989, I felt that the most horrific incident to occur in relation to the protests so far played out. On this day, Chinese troops with tanks and armoured cars stormed the streets of Beijing, killing hundred of protestors of the People's Liberation Army, firing into the crowd indiscriminately and arresting thousands of pro-democracy supporters, many of whom are still, to this day, being held in prison cells.

Sometimes I think that we take our freedom for granted. I mean life is so hard what with having running water, food, clothes and shelter, not to mention access to education, technology and health care. We really do have it tough when our iPhone breaks now don't we?

But one other thing that I think we take for granted is our right to political opinions. Our whole political system is based in voting, that it is the people's opinion which elects leaders and their rules. It's therefore hard to think about other countries not having that same freedom, that same right to an opinion.

In relation to the riots, using words can't effectively explain how much the Chinese people wanted that same freedom that wasn't instantly given to them on the occasion of their being born, as it was for many of us. Instead, I'm going to show you this video. Of a man, who was standing up for what he believed in, defiant of the authorities, because it was his opinion that enough was enough.


The man had the courage to do what he believed would better his country. And it just so happened that it involved putting himself at risk. 

If the time ever comes in Australia when democracy ceases to exist, or when those in higher power bully the lesser people, I hope that I have the same amount of courage and believe in my own opinions to stand up like this man and thousands of others did. 





Video available: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9-nXT8lSnPQ
Image available: http://cryptome.org/cn/tk/tiananmen-kill.htm 

Saturday, 2 June 2012

3rd JUNE 1968

Now of all the riveting events that happened on this day throughout history, and believe me there were some really, really good ones (death of a euthanasia crazed doctor anyone?) I decided that this one, the one I am about to explain was interesting on two points. But first, what is it that I'm talking about? What did happen today that I find more interesting than a Latvian gay pride march and the return of 400 children to a polygamist sect in Texas?

On this day in 1968, American Pop Art artist Andy Warhol, was shot and wounded in his New York film studio by actress Valerie Solanas.



Okay, now yes, in a small way this is interesting. I mean, possibly the most famous Pop artist in all the world was shot at; an attempt of murder on his life was committed by this Valerie Solanas woman, whomever she may be. Well, I'll tell you who she is because she is mighty interesting (point one).

Valeria Solanas was a whirlwind of hate, anger, and general dislike towards men. And her life, in all its tragedy, justifies this hatred.

When she was little, she claims to have been sexually abused by her father on a regular bases. After her mother and father divorced, her mother remarried. Solanas disliked her step-father and started acting out at school, writing insults for other children to use at the cost of a dime, punching a boy for teasing a small girl and, possibly my favourite rebellious act, hitting a nun. In retaliation, Solanas' mother sent her to live with her grandmother and grandfather, the latter Solanas claimed to be a violent alcoholic who beat her. After leaving the grandparents home, becoming homeless, Solanas had a son, fathered by either a married man or a sailor. Either way the child, named David, was taken away from Solanas and adopted.

So her teen years were pretty messed up. In comparison, university was pretty blasé, although it was during these years that she openly claimed to be a lesbian. Surprise, surprise. It was after university that she moved to New York, became a prostitute to support herself, wrote two plays, met Andy Warhol in an attempt to get one of the plays performed, became somewhat friends with him, acted in two of his films, wrote her most famous piece of work, the S.C.U.M Manifesto (Society for Cutting Up Men, although it was proposed that this was never what the acronym stood for), met publisher Maurice Girodias who published S.C.U.M and who then told Solanas he would publish all her other work from this moment on. Now is where it gets really interesting.

Solanas took this to mean that Girodias now owned her. She would be limited in what she could write and whether or not Girodias wanted to publish it. She didn't like this. Again, surprise, surprise. She went to fellow writer (because she always called herself a writer first, not an actress) Paul Krassner, told him she was going to shoot Girodias and that she needed money to do so. Krassner gave her $50 and Solanas bought a .32 automatic pistol.

Girodias was lucky. He had gone away for the weekend, as Solanas found out when she enquired about him at the Chelsea Hotel. But she had the gun so what was she to do?

At around midday, Solanas arrived at The Factory, Warhol's film studio. Paul Morrisey, a fellow film director of Warhol's arrived and asked Solanas what she was doing. She replied that she was waiting for Andy to get money off him for her first play, which she believed Andy had stolen from her. In reality it had just been misplaced. At 2 o'clock Solanas went into the studio, travelling up and down the escalator seven times before Warhol arrived.

Now at the time, the people in the studio numbered five people. There was Warhol's manager Fred Hughes, Morriesy, Warhol, Solanas herself and critic Mario Amaya. The telephone rang and Warhol answered it, whilst Morrisey went to the bathroom. This was her moment. Solanas shot at Warhol three times. The first two missed, the third went through his left lung, spleen, stomach, liver, oesophagus and finally his right lung. Solanas then shot at Mario Amaya, the bullet going through his right hip. Finally, Solanas attempted to shoot Hughes in the head point blank. However, her gun jammed and she left. Warhol was taken to Columbus hospital where five doctors operated on him for five hours to save his life.

Solanas turned herself in later that day. She was brought before Manhattan Criminal Court where she did not try to deny her actions. The judge sent her to Bellevue Hospital for psychiatric observation. A year later, in June of 1969, Solanas was deemed fit to stand trial. Representing herself, pleading guilty to reckless assault with intent to harm, she was sentenced to three years in prison. The year she had spent in Bellevue counted towards her sentence as time served.

Now I'm sorry but you try reading that and not be interested (point two). The woman was so just messed up. And yet at the same time, so interesting because of being messed up. Normally, when things get to that stage, where, if you met that person down the street you would fear for your life, you stop being interested. If I could have met Solanas (she died of pneumonia in 1988 at the age of 52) that would have been so incredible. The stories that she could have told. I would have loved to live during this time. The past just seems so much more interesting than the present. Modern society constitutes those advocating for gay marriage, or peace, all great things of course but still nothing in comparison to a woman going out and shooting another person because she was that angry.

You just don't hear a lot these days about bitter woman.

Probably, no, DEFINITELY, a good thing.

I recommend reading more about both the S.C.U.M Maifesto and Valerie Solanas. It will open your eyes to a whole new point of view of the world.







Image available: http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2010/05/andy_warhol_sho.php 

Friday, 1 June 2012

2nd JUNE 1953

God save the Queen!

On this day in 1953, Elizabeth II was formally crowned as The Queen of England at a ceremony held in Westminster Abbey.



Apparently it was a rainy day. Nonetheless, millions of fans stood and cheered outside in the pouring rain whilst 27-year-old Elizabeth and 30-year-old Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh and her husband, journeyed along an eight kilometre procession route in a gilded horse-drawn carriage.

Those who did not leave their homes had the benefit of watching the coronation proceedings on television for the first time, as well as listening to it on the radio.

This year of course as everybody knows is the Queen's Diamond Jubilee, in that she has been 60 years on the throne. Whilst today was her official coronation, Elizabeth had been considered Queen since her fathers death on the 6 February 1952.

Today, Queen Elizabeth is queen regnant of 16 sovereign states. At the start of her reign, 12 of these states were British colonies or dominions.

Of all other British monarchs, Queen Victoria is the only one to have celebrated a Diamond Jubilee in 1897.

Festivities for the Diamond Jubilee scheduled for Australia include the Royal Australian Mint releasing a 50-cent commemoration coin, Prime Minister Julia Gillard, on the 4 June, lighting a beacon atop Parliament House, the renaming of a street in the parliamentary triangle in Canberra as Queen Elizabeth Terrace, the naming of a new Western Australia waterfront as Queen Elizabeth quay and possibly best of all, here in Queensland, we get a day off.

That's right! Beat that commemoration coin! We get a holiday, hah!

And on that note, may you live and reign for several years more your majesty!

For full proceedings and keeping up-to-date with all the action, just go to the official Jubilee website




Image available: http://ellasnest.wordpress.com/